Are you willing to get the Covid vaccine when offered?

Arathrael said
So in the table you've posted, it says "These data should be interpreted with caution. See information below in footnote about the correct interpretation of those figures"

And above the second table you've partially posted, it states, "Please note that the following table should be read in conjunction with pages 31 to 33 of this report, and the footnotes provided on page 39."

And then the footnotes, and those pages, explain, in precise and great detail, why "Comparing case rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated populations should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 infection", and that "Vaccine effectiveness has been formally estimated from a number of different sources and is summarised on pages 5 to 14 in this report." They have links to articles - https://ukhsa.blog.gov.uk/2021/11/02/transparency-and-data-ukhsas-vaccines-report/ - explaining why not to do what you're doing.

And yet, you've somehow missed all of that, and run full pelt into the incorrect interpretation of those figures.

And that's the problem here. You're confusing your lack of reading comprehension with everyone else's. Maybe don't.

Except I didn't estimate effectiveness. Read page 5-14 and look at the data that is presented.
Pointing out the rate of infection does not equal estimating the effectiveness of the vaccine.
The tables that are listed shows the amount of people that has gotten COVID. What you are pointing to is speaking about is "J&J is 85% effective against this; Phizer is 90% effective against that."
So looking at the table 11, even taking the percentage of vaccinated persons into consideration, the vaccinated are catching COVID at a much higher rate than the unvaccinated, unless one of my medical peeps or statisticians tells me I'm reading the numbers wrong.

And you keep coming at me about reading comprehension, but you clearly didn't read what I said in that post.

jahsoul357 said
If that's what you got from my post, you either lack reading comprehension (which I doubt) or (more probable) your bias towards this topic won't allow you to read any post that doesn't agree with yours objectively. "Fat kids," as you call them, would fall under the groups considered vulnerable.