This entire conversation has been around the fact that the vaccine does not stop the spread. You presented this statement and the document. Reread my second reply to this. I clearly state that this statement hangs on the notion that the vaccine is effective at preventing infection. If a person is not infected, then a person can't spread it right? My medical peeps can jump in again, but if I'm reading this right. This is saying that vaccines are effective at preventing infection and due to that people are uninfected, they can't spread the virus. If the vaccinated does get COVID, which we are always told is rare, then the risk is reduced based on what the vaccine actually does (speed up the decline of viral load). But we have now learned that while the vaccinated viral load drops faster, the peak load is the same. You are just as contagious. So with that being the case, let's go to your next statements
The interpretation of data states:
While you are going on about efficacy, the document is telling you that as more people get vaccinated, we will see more cases. But the raw data is also telling us that the vaccinated are catching it at a much higher rate than the unvaccinated. It also shows that the vaccine is protecting the individual better from hospitalization, as the rates are higher among the unvaccinated vs the vaccinated and thus overall death, which backs up my statement that triggered this. So read that document and find which statement I am saying is false. Something else that you are failing to realize is the effectiveness associated with Infections is listed with "Medium Confidence," which states:
So take that coupled with the raw data and get what you want out of it.