So you're largely ignoring the post you're replying to, misinterpreting the raw data, again, despite it explicitly saying this should not be done and describing exactly why the data can't be interpreted in that way, and failing to comprehend the very simple notion that a shorter duration of infectiousness will overall result in fewer infections, all while continually ignoring the fundamental fact that it's been plainly shown, with evidence, that vaccination is effective against transmission.
I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish here with that approach, but unless it's "wasting people's time" I would suggest that it's not happening.