This whole medscape poll argument is seemongly causing too many folks to be very pedantic.
Sammy always said it was an informal poll, via registered users. It was simply to make the point (if memory serves) that physicians and other medical professionals have different views about the vaccine for themselves, for adults, and for children. The risk calculus is different for different age groups and health levels. I think that is a simple and fair point.
You can be overwhelmingly for something, but context always matters.
For example. I'd say all of us are overwhelmingly for the Saints to win games. But, you may find more folks hesitant about winning next week, squeaking into the playoffs (depending on SF), so that our 2022 draft position doesn't move far for a potentially meaningless playoff game. Context matters.
I don't want to dive into the math, but they dug into the numbers and said 30% of physicians with kids that age.. so, the % that said it didn't apply were removed, and the remaining answers we re normalized with less participants. That would increase the %.
The articles talking about pediatricians is talking about the normal childhood vaccines, and if you look closely, one mentioned the poll was from 2012, despite being a 2020 article....
Can we move on?