Mike Tanier criticising Loomis' cap management again

sammymvpknight said

I’m not arguing with you. I agree. But when people complaint in hindsight, I can see their argument. If Loomis was told five years ago that the Saints would have a series of one and outs…would he have made the sacrifices that he made? I’m doubtful. You SHOULD be successful when you have the highest effective cap in the league…and the Saints just couldn’t get it done.

Click to expand...

Again, I think you're wrong. Of course he would have done what he did. One and outs suck, but you can't get to the superbowl without getting to the playoffs.

Hindsight is clouding your vision and concern for someone else's money or something.

We were extraordinarily successful. You seem to be under the impression that success in the NFL is judged by Superbowls when that's not really true. You have to be successful to have a chance at the Superbowl and while first round losses are frustrating, it's all the path to a championship.

Do you think he'd have done a better job saving all that money and going 7 and 9? If so, what kind of Saints fan are you?