Is it better to be dead or wounded? Not sure why you felt the need to go all strawman there... I certainly am not saying people being wounded is insignificant. But if you gave me the choice to come out of a mass casualty event wounded or dead, I'll choose being wounded. And the fact of the matter is, the pressure cooker bomb was less effective at killing people than guns are.
I'm not even advocating banning firearms. I am trying to get people to acknowledge that having lots of guns cheaply and readily available make it easier to kill people.
Again, if all these other choices are just as effective as guns, which appears to be your claim, why do people choose to use guns way more to kill people than other choices? By your logic, if a gun was no more effective at killing people than any other choice, then people would be choosing other methods more frequently, but they aren't. Out of the 21,000 homicides in 2020, 19,000 were committed by guns. So, by far people choose to use guns to kill people.
If you want to defend yourself, are you walking around with a pressure cooker?