One thing I don't want in the draft

Trajectory means something (barely) when there are more than a couple of points plotted in the player's career to date. You're jumping ahead just a couple of years here.

All I've seen is someone second guessing a pick they didn't like (I suspect you were pounding the table for a 'playmaker' instead at the time) and using that player's injuries which happened after the draft pick as some sort of justification, despite that being impossible to know at the time of the pick. Do you see how that doesn't work?

As for the trades, they wanted a WR and an OL in that round and obviously felt both were worth the cost of acquisition. I don't know that I like the cost either, but no one makes any move like this, while also saying, 'Ooh, but... y'know... what if he gets injured in year 1...?'. Because they don't have time machines, guy. They just don't.
Penning wasn't even a penciled in starter...he was a projected as a project that even if healthy wasn't going to start week 1...maybe without the injury he starts before November but that isn't the type of offensive lineman that you bank additional draft capitol to make sure you get. There were at least 2 other tackles drafted after him that contributed just as much.

My take on linemen, is that its almost all about coaching...they're all big/strong guys, coaching makes all but the elite few interchangeable.

I hope your right, but even when healthy he was a scary pass blocker. Where would he be rated compared to this years tackles if we were just patient. I think the only trade won was Jimmy Graham, and that was just a borderline win with Unger. Stephon Anthony sucked
We won the compensation part of the Graham trade, but we totally blew the pick.