Someone made the comment that 100% of the blame would be on Pete regarding the offense and I peacefully responded with my own personal opinion explaining who else and why I wouldn't just hold Pete solely responsible. Not sure what is wrong with that. At no point was I bashing anybody. Then yes, it got hijacked by someone attacking the fact I suggested DC could and should play better in NO than at the Raiders, which judging by a lot of posts on here, people agree as they think the Raiders actually held him back. Not to mention the seemingly good job the FO has done at rebuilding the roster. Which is a valid point.