The policy is stated in terms of being "charged" with a violent felony - not what the end result is so the league could certainly say that the 6-game suspension is appropriate here. But there's also a tradition of letting the criminal charges work themselves out and then going from what the result is. The examples of this are many - just about every time there's a criminal case, the league waits to issue suspension, in part because cases are sometimes later dismissed without any penalty.
An example of that is the Melvin Gordon DUI. The league policy says players "charged with DUI" get a 3-game suspension, and Gordon was indeed charged with DUI. But he fought it and eventually the DA dropped the charges based on some concerns about how the officer conducted the traffic stop. The league deferred to this result and Gordon was not suspended.
So while the 6-game suspension for being charged with a violent felony is still on the table, I personally think it will be fewer based on the final result being a misdemeanor and the victim's case is also resolved and dismissed.