I'm certain that's not what I'm saying. Obviously, if the facts support the claims of the family, then they do; but, assuming someone isn't stealing because they're rich is an opinion that is unsupported by evidence. Too often, we believe there to be a correlation between monetary success and moral virtue.
A question, when the FBI relies on a profile of serial killers when investigating, does that mean they are rejecting the idea that someone other than one who fits the profile is the killer?