It's a sad situation but in hindsight the Saints should have gotten what they could for him in a trade after drafting Reggie, you just can't tie up that much money in the RB position when every year there are 5th and 6th rounders starting for teams.
Are you kidding me? You're seriously telling me that having Deuce there had nothing to do with Reggie's effectiveness? That Deuce-Reggie wasn't the best 1-2 RB punch in the league in 2006? That we would have had the same amount of success that year without him? That losing him had nothing to do with our sub-par performance in 2007?