What if I told you that we might be re-living the Mike Ditka era?

I intentionally left Loomis out because that's another thread, and for the record I'm not a fan of his. However he deserves his spot in the Saints HOF whenever he leaves the organization.
If Loomis were the GM during the Ditka years, do you think the results would have been any different?

I agree that Mike & Buddy worked well together. Apart they had success but could never return and win the big game.
Loomis definitely has his flaws too, but from a Saints perspective, probably the best GM we've ever had, although you could make a case for Finks based on where the franchise was at the time he took over and what he had to create essentially from scratch. That's good question whether results would have been different with Loomis / Ditka. Loomis has tended to facilitate what his head coach wanted, especially early in his career - certainly with Haslett and, justifiably with Payton. I think the Loomis we have now, exerts more control over football operations with DA. I guess if, theoretically, Loomis hired Ditka, then he probably would have deferred a lot of football decisions to Ditka and we'd have similar results - at least early. I guess I'd hope that Loomis wouldn't have been dumb enough to hire Ditka in the first place! Definitely an interesting question.