Listen man, would it help you if I just post the quote of Loomis saying that they draft BPA at a position of need? It's like you think I came up with this explanation myself.
Insinuating I'm too stupid to understand common sense would be enough to irritate me on a regular day but because I know that most comments like that typically fit the person better if they stand in the mirror and say it to themselves I'm not offended. It's you struggling here but i mean, hey I'll post the quote...just give me the greenlight.
Alright, so I found a quote, not the one I was looking for which was far more recent but it's from 2011.
To your point - Loomis admits that they are always trying to fill needs in FA so that they can ultimately draft the BPA. That's what they "want" to do, and that's known. But as I've been saying all along, you don't always FILL the need prior and so it is still potentially a need when it's your time to pick. IF the player is graded high and it's also a position of need, relative to other positions that may be "wants" the team will most times draft for the need.
Obviously to your point that doesn't always workout and unfortunately that's the case more often than not. Typically a team is unable to fill every single must and need prior to the draft and they are forced to select a need. All teams reach, it happens at QB position probably the most.
So I think at this point this is less argument, and more misunderstanding. I'm definitely not saying teams go into a draft zeroing in a position and will select that position no matter what regardless of value. That would be stupid, however every team aspires to draft BPA and some teams depending on how the roster is built, and how successful their offseason was, they are afforded that luxury. But more often than not...they end up having to take BPA at a position of need. It is what it is .
If I can find the more direct quote of Loomis saying their goal is to draft BPA but most times position of need forces the issue I will, but I'm leaving work.
Take care man,