Saturday games

Bourbon said

While they might not have literally chosen one player over the other, the fact is they let him go, kept the other and then have tried to replace his production through the draft. I don’t see how what I said is “wrong” other than if you interpret it in a specific way.

What is evident is that you wanted to rush to a smug response instead of actually having adding value. Just because other people agree with you doesn’t make it less lazy or dim witted.

I’ll admit I should have worded it differently, but only because it baited idiots like you into coming out with this internet nerd “ackutally” crap.

Ok - this is my quota for arguing with morons for the day. See ya!

Click to expand...

Lol thanks for the kind words man.

One area I will say I apologize for is I should have just skipped over the post. No matter how wrong it is, what’s the point of even responding, so I apologize for that.

Proud of you for admitting you were wrong in your own special way. Even though you’re still wrong lol. Saying they kept one and let the other go is saying there was some type of option. Like saying they both were FA and they made a decision to go with Davenport.

It’s simply wrong as there was never a conversation because Davenport was under contract and came off 10.5 sacks.

Also, I never said anything to you. Just simply asked the forum how much longer will people be misinformed when this has been cleared up by other people on the board. By the way, as you can see multiple others commented as well because it’s funny to see.

Calm down with the name calling man, it’s childish and we all see you don’t talk to people like that off the internet. Lol