Ronald Curry calling plays

DSnfla said
SMH just because you played in the league does not mean you are going to be a great coach. Like I said RC was an Off AST under Harbaugh for 2 yrs when they were bad. An Off Ast is a glorified intern with no input on the O. When Harbaugh got fired so did he. He comes here and had the same title. When Morton the WRs coach took the OC job with the Jets Curry became WRs coach , he pretty much inherited talent with Thomas, Ginn and Smith. Then we got a real WRs coach when Curtis Johnson came back and he was moved to QB coach which was another low responsibility job with Brees and Pete here. So his 11 yrs coaching experience has been with TWO teams and before DA 2 HCs and mostly in low priority positions.

Waldron has almost 20 yrs as a coach and has been an OC calling plays for 3 yrs, He has worked under McVay with 2 different teams and is credited with turning Geno Smith around
Robinson also has worked under McVay for 5 yrs and is passing game coordinator and QB coach
Neither have been just an Off Ast

Waldron's offense hasn't set the league on fire these past 3 seasons, although I will give credit for Geno.

You actually made some good points in favor of Ronald Curry although you haven't recognized them just yet....like Ginn's best years were with the Saints. Like the fact that Curry has learned under Harbaugh AND under Sean Payton.....like Curry has had first hand experience with the Drew Brees....like the fact that he has shown versatility by being able to coach WRs AND coach QBs. Sean could have just gotten rid of Ronald Curry when Curtis came back, but he didn't. He made sure to keep Curry on staff, and for good reason.

yeah, ok...it's low-level when Curry coached with Payton and Brees, but it's not low-level when Robinson coaches with McVay and Stafford??? Same coaching roles but Ronald Curry's impact gets diminished right??