The Electric Vehicle (EV) discussion thread (Merged)

Just for everyone’s benefit - Tesla is a publicly-traded corporation. The board, therefore, has a fiduciary duty to the shareholders and shareholders have a right of legal action called a derivative action wherein they can challenge action taken by the company as a violation of the fiduciary duty to the shareholders.

Here, Musk’s $55 BIlLION bonus was dramatically out of line with even the most lucrative bonuses paid by Fortune 500 companies (found to be 250x the median and 33x the next highest in terms of public companies). The court further found that the board didn’t even engage in proper negotiation over the bonus, and that key board members and company attorneys were hopelessly aligned with Musk’s interests and failed to carry their duty to shareholders.

And contrary to Musk’s comments, the shareholder derivative action for publicly held companies is available in every state on basically the same standard.

It’s a 200-page decision after a discovery period and trial. It’s hardly a judge just making an arbitrary call: https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=359340

I didn't think it was an arbirtrary call, but I also wasn't sure exactly what the requirements were that allow a judge to negate a compensation package. A lot of the articles I read after the fact said that it was a surprise the judge ruled against the board here. So, if it was a surprise, what's going on?

I already believe that most executive compensation in Fortune 500 companies is ridiculous, and this is of course super ridiculous. So, I'm curious what standards are metrics are used to determine when it crosses the line. So, in this case, it's just that no serious negotiations took place?