I didn't think it was an arbirtrary call, but I also wasn't sure exactly what the requirements were that allow a judge to negate a compensation package. A lot of the articles I read after the fact said that it was a surprise the judge ruled against the board here. So, if it was a surprise, what's going on?
I already believe that most executive compensation in Fortune 500 companies is ridiculous, and this is of course super ridiculous. So, I'm curious what standards are metrics are used to determine when it crosses the line. So, in this case, it's just that no serious negotiations took place?