Current Saints 53 man roster after cuts
I tried to be gentle and give you the information, but you just ignored it. You are either misinterpreting the NFL's intent or purposely being argumentative.
You entered the back and forth between me and St. Widge. He's quite capable of making his own case without you carrying his water for him.
I didn't need to interpret or misinterpret the league rule on this. It's clear what it says. You've chosen to speak on what the NFL's "Intent" of the rule is, not me.
I'm not being argumentative. I'm simply standing by the facts as stated by the league rules.
https://operations.nfl.com/gameday/nfl-schedule/2024-25-important-nfl-dates/
| 1-Sep | Final day of preseason training camp for all clubs, as defined in CBA Article 23, Section 10. |
Is the game Officially Over because you choose to leave at the end of the 3rd quarter when it's evident that the Saints will lose that day?
When you were given a test in school and had an hour to complete it, was the testing period over because you finished your exam in 58 minutes?
Do you trust what The Rules State, that are clear and concise, or do you rather question the intent and authority of the rule maker?
D.A. was questioned last week as to whether the team was game planning for the Panthers in their practices, which were here.
His answer was "No, not yet. We're still evaluating the players on our roster."
The first day of Regular Season Practices began yesterday, Monday, September 2nd, 2024.
The back and forth that
St. Widge and I were in disagreement on was a broader subject than the date training camp ended. For reference, you can visit page 6 of this thread, where it all started, that also included input from
Meily and
Webster. You certainly have a right to chime in. I'm just telling you there's a bigger picture.
At its core were the following contentions:
1. Whether or not Taysom Hill could enter a game should Carr get injured and be effective with limited snaps in the offseason in the new system.
2. Whether or not if Hill had any snaps at QB during the offseason beyond the "Wildcat" type.
3. If All off-season practices had been viewed in their entirety by the media.
Number 1 would remain an opinion, regardless of the answers to #2 and #3, until proven one way or the other on the field of play.
Number 2 would enlighten those outside of the organization, fans and media included, as to how the Saints may intend to use Hill in 2024 when lined up at QB.
Number 3 has not been confirmed yet by a source with media credentials having gone on record to clear that question up.
Until then, we can't be certain either way.