The comparison--introduced by dennisrwoo through their work history--is that they are both use-of-force work, and thus both have rules and decisions related to non-compliance.
If you find zero comparative value in their work, that is fine, but I am genuinely curious to hear how they deal with a subject who attempts to dictate an interaction, w/out using force. I think a skilled/clever worker could sometimes, but doubt that all workers could do it 100% of the time.
Or he could just ignore the civilian's attitude because his actions were not harming anyone but himself. The cop had everything he needed to complete the traffic stop.
The things the officer lacked due to Hill's actions were visibility of activity in the vehicle to ensure their safety, a means to interact with the driver, and the driver's registration and insurance (if what I'm seeing in the video is accurate--only his license was turned over).
He doesn't roll the window up in the cop's face, he rolled it up as the cop steps away, assuming the cop was going to continue with reasoning for the the stop and start the citation.
The bodycam shows the officer never walks away. He leans forward to look at the front of the vehicle (he'd have to walk back to return to his motorcycle), and as he does Hill begins rolling up the window. The officer instructs him to lower the window several times and he refuses. The officer remains at the side of the vehicle until they decide to remove Hill from it.
This was a Traffic Stop, not a Terry Stop. Terry Stops are generally referenced when police are conducting searches without a warrant, there's no searches happening here as the reason for the stop was to issue a traffic citation.