Sean "Diddy" Combs houses were raided by Feds (Update: Diddy charged)

superchuck500 said
I’ve been around a long time and seen all sorts of things happen - some even unbelievable things - and I’ve also seen people believe things to be true based purely on conjecture and what they want to believe for various reasons including simply that it’s more interesting . . . but were not true or never shown to have any persuasive evidence.

I also believe in evidence and in the demonstrated value of Occam’s Razor. Epstein killing himself is abundantly plausible if not obvious - and there’s no real evidence that some number of unknown entities conspired to his murder despite some abnormalities about the security that night. The counter-factual is appealing because it is intriguing and would validate what many people believe is true about how power functions apart from the law.

But there’s no real evidence of any such conspiracy. And you’re wrong - it wasn’t the coroner who said that, it was a pathologist hired by the Epstein family. The coroner (medical examiner) firmly disagreed with those suppositions.

I despise him for helping to start a false, illegal war but remember Rumsfeld's famous comments about known and unknown and how their known-unknowns, unknown-knowns, or unknown-unknowns? It sounds like either idiotic or annoying word play until you really think about what that means. A good conspiracy, like JFK's assassination, can fool Occam's Razor especially when investigators dont know about all the existing variables even after all the bread crumbs have been swept away and you don't know where to start looking. In those types of situations, Occam's Razor only gives you part of the answer, the rest mostly gets classified as "unknown" or labeled as speculation. And speculation isn't admissible in a court of law, Chuck.

Don't you find that independent pathologist claims about how Epstein's suicide a bit curious and how it was a very odd way to kill one's self and that his investigation and examination found things about how he died that seemed suspicious or could suggest the possibility of foul play?

Ive read some stories about how that official coroner did kind of a cursory review, some people claimed he didnt do a more thorough, harder look but considering that his claims were criticized, yeah, I imagine he would be pissed his report got called out in public. He can firmly disagree with what that private investigator found as much as he wants, that doesn't necessarily mean mistakes werent made during his autopsy.

Ive never heard a decent explanation for why those security abnormalities happened that night