You seem to have missed my point. You cannot assume because people have met and had conversations that they are involved in criminal enterprises together.
SC500 was saying that as well when he said, there's no proof. If you are unfamiliar with proof, it's what is needed for a successful trial. It's become pretty popular to try things on the interwebz and in media. Fortunately, neither of those options hold up in a real court. You can actually get in a bit of trouble for insisting something without proof. Ask Fox about how that Dominion case worked out for em.