Spencer Rattler’s first start was…

The X-Man said
Carr seems better because we were completely healthy the first two games. Just the fact that Carr had a healthy Taysom Hill is at least three third down conversions that sustain drives, which may equate to more points for us and less points for our opponents. But forget the theoretical, here’s the deal: we have no future, ZERO, with Carr, and we know it. We MAY have a future with Rattler. That possibility alone is enough for me to go with Rattler for the remainder of the year in preparation for next year where we will (we “WILL”) have a new head coach and more weapons.

OK you want a in depth response , DC didn't SEEM better he WAS better. Go look @ his QBR for the 1st 2 games and that had nothing to do with Taysom. it was also with just a healthy OL not even a great one. To say that we have ZERO future as you say it with DC is completely ludicrous, 1st , because you nor anyone else knows the future and 2nd we had PROOF , UNDENIABLE proof that DC can be elite with healthy just average OL
Rattler showed little to think that he's THE future. Now it like almost anything is possible but I wouldn't bet $$$ on it.
We are 6 games into the season not even close to half way but you in your infinite wisdom want to throw away the best chance we have to make the playoffs by starting our 5th rd pick backup QB that did not look great in is 1st start ,EVEN knowing that we WILL be getting our injured players back in the next few weeks
I thank all the stars in the heavens that you are not the GM of the team I have been following since 1967