As opposed to saying they chose Watson when they didn't actually acquire him. It's not any different than saying they chose Adams when they didn't actually acquire him. There's plenty you can criticize the FO and coaches for, but criticizing them for something that didn't actually happen is a bit much.
But it isn't. Had the Browns not saved us, the decision was made. We were going to michael scott into the lake. We can certainly criticize a decision regardless of the outcome. Or did you not listen to Loomis and "look beyond the results"