and it's part of why the discussion is squishy/ambiguous
there are almost certainly genetic markers at play - but the article and analysis is mostly about socialization
neither is a complete picture - both can help you analyze the past but are less equipped to help you predict behavior
genetics wants its trait to survive so it's not going to put all of its eggs in one basket - it will spread traits broad enough but put most of the where the have the best chance of surviving (I do realize that's more a narrative framing of a more complicated process)
so sure some women will have more masculine traits than other women (and some men)
BUT
the socialization along gender lines is certainly in play - some will be raised in environments that educate against those roles but they're fighting a social system just as entrenched as systemic racism
so sure there are going to be a handful of women who use power like men - women who use femininity to wield
just like there are women who commit sexual or domestic abuse - but it's certainly a much smaller % and the existence of those does not ameliorate the need to redress the antisocial tendencies taught to young boys (it should be taught to everyone
and TBC - it's not a 'male' trait - it's a trait that mostly men present