UnitedHealth CEO shot

Yes, it’s funded through taxes—no secret about that. The key difference is that all the money is allocated directly to healthcare, not to CEOs, stockholders, or to sustain a complex and costly billing and insurance system. In this model, doctors, specialists, and hospital staff are government employees, and they still receive competitive, decent pay.

This approach also saves money by operating under a unified system where all your health information is readily accessible to any doctor or specialist you see. This eliminates the need for redundant tests and streamlines care.

Additionally, your health records are always available to you, ensuring transparency and empowering you to actively participate in your healthcare. The system is secured with a highly robust government login using three-factor authentication: something you know, something you have, and something you do. This ensures both privacy and accessibility, creating a more efficient and patient-centered system.
And that sounds great...

Mexico has a system very similar to Denmark (even the past president said Mexico's system was better), yet it sucks. Why do you think that is?

And look, don't get me wrong...I am not poo-pooing what you are saying. You guys have a great system in Denmark, one of the better ones in the world, and I know this because of the dumb declarations from the previous Mexican president about IMSS being better than the Danish system, and what ensued in the Mexican media. But when it comes to healthcare, Denmark is a completely different ecosystem, for many reasons, and it is not just the profit aspect of it.