Haener starts vs Commanders: 1 INT, 5 punts ; Rattler replaced Haener in 2H: led to 19 points

Haener starts vs Commanders: 1 INT, 5 punts ; Rattler replaced Haener in 2H: led to 19 points

Wait, I want to point something out here because I'm not the only poster to see the incredible hypocrisy this guy above displays on a regular basis.....

So, to help make his point in this thread he downplays the fact that McCoy is out because he was the only starter missing.....

DSnfla said
Yes McCoy makes a difference but he was the only starter on the OL missing in the Charger game and Olave and Taysom played that game and it was Rattler's worst game

Back when we lose to the Eagles, a typical DA led Saints loss, McCoy is superman and once he went out we had no chance against the Eagles....and would have certainly beat them had he remained in the game.....

DSnfla said
Your post is just ridiculous, McCoy IS the superman of our OL, He makes the protection calls and it would have been him blocking Carter. So people saying him going out is a BS excuse it just moronic. Had he been in there we would have run the ball better and blocked Carter better which equals better offense and more scoring. Philly's depth at OL is probably better than ours also they did not lose their CENTER. Believe me Philly's DT's are miles better than anyone ATL has on the DL

So which is it? Does McCoy only matter under certain circumstances? I'm confused....(I'm not, this guy spouts BS all over the place).....

And to the original OP, at this point I think it makes sense to take a look at Haener, given the notion that it appears (at least to the coaches) that neither separated themselves in practice during the week.....