UnitedHealth CEO shot

I believe it was the definition of cold blooded. "Killing someone in cold blood" refers to the act of murder committed with deliberate intent, without any emotion, provocation, or remorse. It suggests a premeditated, calculated, and unfeeling approach to taking someone's life, typically without any significant emotional disturbance or reaction during the act. The phrase emphasizes a lack of empathy or justification for the violence.
I’m trying to figure out if there is inconsistency or not here
So generally you are fine if an aggrieved party gets extrajudicial retribution if the crime is personal and targeted

But extrajudicial retribution that’s more calculated and the crime victims number in the 100,000s or even millions- that’s not good

Do I have that right?