Head Coach if there is no GM change

Unless this poster has access to every single hot candidates’ desires, way of thinking, how much they’re willing to budge to finally obtain their dream job they’ve worked extremely hard for, how much money means to them, etc, then this post’s premise is indeed conjecture. Forum respect and past posts don’t change that.

And let me be clear…there is nothing wrong with that! But if someone clearly labels something as an opinion, then gives an opinion I disagree strongly with, I am going to express it, regardless of who said it.

It could have been Underhill, Sean Payton, or whoever that said it…I just don’t agree with all these candidates are going to turn their noses up at a NFL HC job offer.

I don't doubt that we'll be able to land a promising coach. There will be someone who wants to prove themselves regardless of our circumstance.

I think you're missing the major point, though, it's that Loomis' stubborn and controlling approach will not be attractive to coaches who want roster control. The idea that a proven insider, who has inside access to this organization, is basing his opinion of Loomis on a "SR Witch Hunt" is kinda crazy to me. But whatever you think. There was no "SR Witch Hunt" of Loomis when he started dropping information with concerns of Loomis last year, was there? Yet you think he's just randomly hopping on some forum bandwagon?