Curious as to What Underhill and Triplett Are Saying about Organizational Change

Again, a different take. Hap Glaudi had the worse sports show on television--he didn't have time to give major league scores because of the time he spent on birthday announcements and CYO scores. And the one time Glaudi did offer a strong opinion, he was opposed to the state building the Superdome. And his radio show on the WWL was worthless because he too often had little to offer and allowed callers with nothing to say to dominate the air time.

I have little idea what Underhill has said or written over the past six months. Before that time, I found Triplett more critical of the organization than Underhill. And from the day Payton stepped down to, say, six months ago, I do not know in the local media of a bigger supporter of Mickey Loomis and his major decisions than Nick Underhill. I cannot say why he was wrong in his big-picture judgment, only that he was wrong. And incidentally, what is Underhill saying today as to what changes, if any, the Saints need to make in the front office and how high those changes should be made? Is he calling for Loomis to be replaced or to step down?