The organization and the culture

A rebuild doesn't require you to get rid of all of your players and start from scratch. Teams are no more likely to succeed by getting rid of everyone before rebuilding over than keeping some players and rebuilding. It's been done successfully both ways and usually takes much longer when you get rid of everyone and start from scratch. Frankly the entire concept of a "rebuild" is just bullshirt talk used by teams to try to stop fans from expecting them to win games. All NFL teams are trying to build a winning roster every year. Some do it and some don't. Calling it rebuilding is just an excuse for sucking.

But thanks for another rant about Loomis when I didn't mention Loomis and I would personally prefer it if he was no longer the GM. But, please don't let that stop you.
I think for me in order to get some fresh eyes and ears in the organization would be for ML to have a position just above the GM and under Lausha. Underhill thanks and I agree that if ML was to change positions it more than likey would be someone around the organization would be the GM. Like maybe a Dave Ziegler or a Michael Parenton. Part of me thinks someone that not close to the organization would be the move for a different perspective. But Ziegler or Parenton could have some fresh ideas of their own.

Either way no matter what anyone says having ML involved in the hiring process of a new HC is an advantage. He saw the qualities of a HOF coach once. He watched SP in the good and bad he did. Yes , DA was a miscalculation but there were a lot of people that thought the hire was fine. You don't just forget what the qualities that your looking for in a HC