For anyone who says Carr is just a stat padder and don’t win:

St. Geezy said
Doesn’t surprise me. I swear I don’t understand what games some people are watching. Carr has always looked solid to me here. It’s like people have their minds made up about him going in and magnify every single thing he does wrong to unreasonable levels, as if other QBs of his ilk aren’t making the same errors every week.

Carr is efficient and you can win with him. But like most QBs like him, he needs help.

Pretty much how I feel about Carr, I thought it was a good move to get him and (at the time) thought he was the best available QB, I don't think much differently now....

SWJJ said
It's HILARIOUS to think that the Raiders are better off having moved on from Carr.

In the DECADE before they had Carr they went 49 - 111 and had ZERO winning Seasons

With Carr as a Starter they went 63 - 83 had a 10 win season, a 12 win season, and should have beaten the Bengals in the playoffs.

Since they cut Carr they are 12-22 and have not had a winning Season.

Implying Carr was the problem in Oakland shows you dont know what you are talking about. Derek Carr gave them their best two season in TWENTY YEARS!

Agree with all of this, the notion that Carr was the problem with the Raiders while he is there is just foolish....the evidence says otherwise....