For anyone who says Carr is just a stat padder and don’t win:

It's HILARIOUS to think that the Raiders are better off having moved on from Carr.

In the DECADE before they had Carr they went 49 - 111 and had ZERO winning Seasons

With Carr as a Starter they went 63 - 83 had a 10 win season, a 12 win season, and should have beaten the Bengals in the playoffs.

Since they cut Carr they are 12-22 and have not had a winning Season.



Implying Carr was the problem in Oakland shows you dont know what you are talking about. Derek Carr gave them their best two season in TWENTY YEARS!
Carr is definitely the best QB they've had in recent years, but there's not a huge difference between 63-83 (.415) and 12-22 (.353). It's the equivalent of being 7-10 instead of 6-11 on average.