Peyton Manning says teams fail young QBs when forcing them to change coaches, systems
If you get a classic GB staff that gave us about five quarterbacks who played elsewhere, I'll use Atlanta as an example. Most new coaches cannot risk their first season on rook. The team likes Penix, but bringing in Kirk was pragmatic for the coaches long term. A new coach needs to win now and Ratt doesn't give you that. Peyton is forgetting that he was first pick in the draft and was a prodigy.The latest, best example of a team going all in on developing a QB after his 1st year was Titans w/ Will Levis. They fired Vrabel and pretty much wiped out the staff. He ended up regressing under the new staff after showing promise.
Rattler's circumstances within context were probably a lot worse than Levis Rookie year but overall his QBR was 6.0 points higher. I'm not saying build around him, but I am saying he's proved he's worth developing. Focusing on said development should encompass keeping the same offensive staff together (or keeping Jonoko at the least).
