Saints are flying Kafka and Weaver in for 2nd interviews [Interviews completed]

I think judging coaches on playoff records is going to have most coaches looking bad unless they are Reid with Mahomes (.842), who easily crushes Reid without Mahomes (.458). It's a matter of math.

In a 14-team playoff, 10 teams are going home with a .500 or worse playoff record. That's 71% of the entrants that are doomed to being even or worse. It's not a parity situation where half the teams on average are .500 or better.

Based on the standards I keep reading, a coach that doesn't have a winning record in the playoffs is a loser, even though most coaches in the playoffs are a favorite to be .500 or worse. Reid without Mahomes would be a bum that chokes in big moments according to a lot of people based on having a losing record in his first 24 playoff games. He has won three Super Bowls plus an AFC Championship since then.

The standard only gets more unrealistic when it's Super Bowl or bust, particularly with Mahomes and Brady dominating the Super Bowl win column in the last decade.

To me this all comes down to the talent that’s on the field and whether you “should” win those games or not. We can’t just always treat playoff performances as a crap shoot, numbers game once you get there. This is where the opinions are really diverging, I think, and why I’ll never see eye to eye on this McCarthy thing with a lot of the pro MM crowd.

I have always said my anti-MM stance was based on the fact that I think he’s had the best roster in the NFL at least 5 seasons, and probably closer to 7-8 during his career. Aaron Rodgers during the McCarthy era in GB is the only QB I would put on the tier of Mahomes in terms of talent. It’s where my Calipari comparison comes from. If he’s hired, I’d love to be wrong.