Unusual criticism from NOF and Underhill

There is a strange turn of agendas going on. Underpants went from rizzi interview is impressive to sky is falling cause muh Joe Brady declined the interview ( probably not even knowing the real reason why declined) but skipped straight to theatrical drama. Meanwhile whiffed on the “Glenn mischaracterization” underpants is on the outside and he’s mad.

Or you know, he doesn't have an agenda and is just reporting the facts as they happen and then giving opinions based on the facts as we know them.

And Nick has always held the view that the NFL tells you who you are both for free agents that think they are worth more and for teams. So yes, Glenn and Brady turning the Saints down is not a good look and it should be a wakeup call to Loomis that the NFL does not view his team as good as he thinks they are, but Nick also has said it doesn't mean you can't get a good coach and it doesn't necessarily mean that Loomis is wrong and the rest of the NFL is right. But, it does appear that the NFL thinks things are worse than Loomis is willing to publicly admit. I do think that Loomis is more aware of the issues than he is willing to publicly admit, but we will soon see if his actions reflect that. Although to some extent it doesn't matter if he thinks things are bad or not, the cap situation really limits what we can do as far as tearing things down so the only question is will he kick the can to sing more free agents than last year.