Saints planned to interview Mike McCarthy; McCarthy didn’t garner enough interest from Saints and will take a year off

ELLIASJWILLIAMS said

I would’ve gone Kaf>Moore but hey, Moore would have been 3rd after McCarthy.

I like them all but I’m not sure what to expect from Moore as a HC. I went back and looked at some old SP interviews from 2006 and though young he had a demeanor about him.

I’m not seeing that w/ more on the surface at least. Perhaps there’s more than meets the eye to him and I’m willing to give him that chance.

Part of me would be Ok if he pulled out lol but still I like him as an option and I completely understand why Loomis was interested, on the flip side it was the same thing that lead him to Allen.

Hopefully this time it’s a hit

Click to expand...

Yea I get the sentiment forsure, to me the guy just has zero Payton vibes and no presence on sideline. What I worry about if that I think we are more likely to see the output of the Chargers O than we are the Philly O we are seeing this season. It’s easy for us to get excited about this guy because of the Eagles season, but if you put last season and this season on a scale, I’m certain we will see Moore lean closer to what we saw with Chargers.

To that end, I was never impressed with the O in Dallas when he ran it, there was a reason they moved on, and it isn’t always Jerry being Wrong. I just don’t see the reason to get completely delusional over this guy because of this Philly season.

Look, I hope im wrong, I really do and want the Saints to succeed, but this to me feel like a “hire a young coach” trend, executed by a front office that clearly doesn’t recognize that makes a good coach (got lucky with Payton), young or old, with demonstrated ability that they are stuck in their ways. To be that spells disaster.

It 100% should have been McCarthy imo. Kafka after. MM would have been alot smoother transition, but hey the chips are in now it sounds like so I guess we will see what Moore can do if accepts job