Especially when the GM is a de facto owner, as here.
Which is the biggest blind spot in the Florio piece - it assumes that Loomis as GM is a feature, not a bug, for a prospective coach. There is some evidence to suggest that the opposite is true.
Exactly. Talking about this team's future without mentioning Mick ignores a critical obstacle. I'm willing to give Moore a fair shot, but Mick is part of the problem; we need new people in the FO instead of the collection of has-beens.