Ian Rapoport: Saints to make a decision on Taysom Hill; hard to imagine Hill returning [T.Hill is turning 35 w/ 18M cap hit & ACL recovery]

DavidM said
Completely understandable that he would, but I'm curious to hear what he says publicly, and more importantly, how he addresses the position during the offseason. Has he discussed the position publicly yet (I'm assuming he hasn't, but I don't know that for a fact) or has there been another source besides what Russini mentioned? I don't follow her, or know much about her, but I've seen she's on the receiving end of a lot of criticism online, and questions raised about her credibility. Of course that doesn't necessarily mean anything, either.

Concern can cover a lot of ground, too. As you said, Carr can only be a short-term answer at his age, and now demonstrated durability, and we don't know, beyond a doubt, what we have in the young guys on the roster - I think especially, Rattler. Concern could be uncertainty or it could be a conclusion that the position group needs to be overhauled.

It's really just what Russini mentioned, but couple that with reports that Loomis is willing to give Moore a grace period, seems to suggest that Carr isn't likely in Moore's long term plans. If for no other reason, he's 34 and only has 2 more years on his contract.

Of course, that doesn't mean Carr won't be here this year and it doesn't mean Moore can't change his mind or keep Carr until he does find the solution. Moore has not said anything publicly and I suspect he won't say anything other than I am evaluating the QB position and/or what he said about Carr previously which is something like he has done a lot of good things in the NFL.

As far as Russini's credibility. I tend to think she is credible and a lot of the noise probably has to do with general hostility to the media more than anything else but I, like you, don't really follow her closely.