Yeah, but how would Trump be able to successfully explain away not trying to defend Taiwan from being invaded potentially and annexed by China in convincing geopoliitical terms and not be slaughtered politically or most GOP senators/congressman losing their jobs come mid-terms. In the case of Ukraine, believe it or not, he's got far more "wiggle room" and political capital to try and appear as a probable peacemaker to end a near-three year long war albeit supposedly aping Russia's preconditions for peace. Ukraine and Zelensky can and more then likely will say no to any Russia keeping its conquered illegal territories, arguing to the international community that doing so sends a message that it rewards Russian aggression and emboldens them to make future threats to the Baltics, Finland, or Poland or some DMZ zone that would be useless if Putin refuses to make any real security guarantees and even if he did, why should Zelensky, E.U. or rest of international community really believe him?