Exhaustive review sponsored by the Pentagon finds NO link between Saddam, al Qaida

Threat assessment, based on captured enemy documents is done at three levels:

Tactical
Operational
Strategic

We're talking about a Pentagon report regarding captured Iraqi documents. The methodology used to dissect said documents requires categorization, addressing each level, in turn.

"no direct operational link" means no links at a level which would provide warfare at that level.

There's nothing hard about this. Y'all can quibble with what I'm saying all you want though. That's fine.

You could understand someone with some level of exasperation with the semantics.

Why would be need to undertake an exhaustive review of 600,000 documents to determine that Al Queda, with help from Saddam, was not a threat to field whole divisions of fighters?