Exhaustive review sponsored by the Pentagon finds NO link between Saddam, al Qaida

Rugger said

Dads

Why would the article only focus on one means of military capability? I would guess that there may have been a tactical link, but was there really a stratigic link? Why would the report not focus on all three and only pick the middle to focus on?

Click to expand...

The article picks only snippets of a report which hasn't been published yet.

Why did the article headline say "no link" when the quote in the story itself clearly says "no operational link"?

The report may very well address all three aspects, but we won't know until the report itself is published tomorrow.

If I had to hazard a guess, it might address the operational level because we are in "Operation Iraqi Freedom" at the operational level so the report addressed operational level concerns.