He made a contradictory statement unless I'm reading something wrong.
First he says:
Then in detail he say:
So I'm not really sure what he's trying to say there? To me it makes no sense to trade him after you just guaranteed paying his 30mil salary. I would only see that if Carr refuses to play unless they trade him. Sounds like a lot of nothing and he just typed a headline to grab attention and nothing was really behind it.
A trade after a restructure would have the effect of selling cap space to another team in return for a draft pick or picks. I seem to be remembering it happening 8 or 9 years ago but don’t remember the particulars.