Exhaustive review sponsored by the Pentagon finds NO link between Saddam, al Qaida

RebSaint said
Don't take me for a fool, bro. You've defended this administration on almost every policy its implemented, from Iraq, to the Patriot Act, to its post-Katrina response. Back when Bush had only a 29% approval rating you were in that number. I remember the threads and issues.

Has nothing to do with anything I'm saying.

If not done in the name of defending the administration, what pray tell motivated you to take such an odd, intellectually untenous position in this regard?

What, lay my credentials out on the table so somebody can accuse me of being condescending, due to my "superior" knowledge? No way.

Only the most die-hard partisans defend the administration's claims before the war--and long since the administration's claims have been discredited by several U.S. government agencies, including the CIA, 9-11 Commission ad naseum.

I told you a long time ago, you might as well registered on up as a Republican. :9:

You're the one who said I was defending the administration.

Me, I was just pointing out the article in question is questionable and the wording can be taken differently if you take into account that it's a Pentagon document, written in Pentagon-speak.

We should really start addressing the article and original post and stop going off on these crusades based on mis-perceptions and mis-conceptions of our fellow posters.