Nah, you didn't like the response. I stated why avoiding a position group is not a good idea. Then I said if I was forced why I'd avoid OL. I dont see one being ranked in the top 9 players. That's not avoiding the position, that's not wasting the value of the pick on a player I don't see as being one of the best 9 in the draft assuming the Saints pick 9th. If the Saints trade down to 15, I don't think avoiding OL is still a good idea. See how that works? Hence my belief that avoiding a position group with the Saints first pick isn't sound. It isn't sanctimonious to say that. On the contrary, I'm showing exactly why that logic is faulty. I could have stopped at my first paragraph but the 2nd paragraph illustrates the problem with avoiding a position. No draftable OL in the the top 9 doesn't mean there's not one in the top 15.
And yes your comprehension needs help if you think saying there's not a OL in the top 9 players this year is trashing the position, LOL. There's not a punter in the top 9, is that trashing too? If I said, "all the OL suck!", that's trashing the position group. Me saying that I safely don't see one OL rated in the top 9 is just my opinion on the top 4% of players (9 out of 257 players) who will be drafted this year. If saying that there's no tackle in the best 4% of players (not the the top 10% or 25% mind you...4%) is trashing the whole position group, then YES your reading comprehension is lacking. I guess I'm trashing Archie Manning if I say he's not the best Saints QB of all time too. No, he's just not Drew Brees.