Is Kellen Moore not impressed with Rattler?

To me the biggest draw of Moore is that fact that he has done well with mid-level QBs doing what was necessary to get the most out of them. So while I may not be high on Dart, I am high on Moore being able to get the best out of any young QB whether it's Dart, Sanders, McCord, Rattler, etc.

Nobody seems to want to ask this question but if that's the case, why not just stick with Carr for the next few years. Carr likely has about 3 years or so before we see a drop off in his play, and in that time, Moore could potentially build a championship caliber team around Carr. I don't know that you can say the same, in that time frame, with a rookie, or even signing a QB this year and using Carr as a bridge QB.

I don't think any of the fans what that. A shiny new toy is always better than the old beat up one, but it's a legitimate option to consider, depending on what Moore thinks of Carr.

And truth be told, with the success rate of QBs, we'd be lucky to find a QB that is as good as Carr. The odds of a QB being worse than Carr is greater than the odds of being a top QB. It's very likely that 10 years from now, the Saints could still be looking for a franchise QB.

I understand the "Carr ain't it" argument. But how many years have the Saints wiffed on O-line and DE? How hard would it be watching Saints games if they did that with QB? And is there any reason to believe that they won't?