- Moderator
- #16
- Joined
- Sep 1, 1997
- Messages
- 17,205
- Reaction score
- 5,474
- Age
- 60
Offline
USC does a better job than almost all SEC schools when it comes to OOC schedules. They have only 3 slots to fill and on a given year I would think ND and Nebraska would be good teams, I am sure Nebraska wasnt 5-7 when the game was set. The only reason LSU had VA Tech on the schedule last year was the fulfillment of a deal 7 or so years prior.
USC has to schedule better OOC games in order to maintain some sort of strength of schedule advantage. They generally don't get it from within their own conference, so they must go outside to do so. SEC teams generally do not, as proven by the number of SEC teams ranked week in and week out. The PAC 10 had a fair number ranked this year, but as the season closed, they fell apart and fell out, which is normal, frankly. USC is about the only team in the PAC 10 that can be counted on to field a good team. They cannot count on their own conference to give them any sort of SOS advantage, so they must do so with OOC games. Even the usual strength from ND was missing this year for USC and Nebraska was a mess -- they honestly had a very weak schedule this year, despite how strong it looked early on, and they are realizing that this hurt them. That is precisely why the early rankings are a joke; who would have thought that ND and Nebraska would be so bad....