- Joined
- Aug 6, 2011
- Messages
- 39,107
- Reaction score
- 62,158
- Age
- 38
Online
Will Mac Jones be Matt Cassell?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Will Mac Jones be Matt Cassell?
I think Kirk Cousins is his ceiling.
That's not a bad ceiling considering he sent us packing 2 out of the last 3 post seasons.
It's like organising the games in a kindergarten playground with you two.I will bet just as you said.
That Mac Jones is and will continue to be a better NFL player/prospect than over-hyped Lawrence.
As far as parameters I think that @TribuneUK can help us work out a scoring strategy.
Sorry.It's like organising the games in a kindergarten playground with you two.
I don't remember Jefferson adding weight but that makes sense.Jefferson put on about ~8-10lbs between the combine and pro day which was enough to bump him over the 2.70lb threshold for RBS which put him more in the average range and not the below average that equates to a negative.
I did trade DK and Chark for the #1 overall where I selected Burrow so moving DK does hurt, but landing Burrow, Jefferson and Claypool with my picks has worked out. That is until Burrow went down.
Case Keenum sent us packing 3 years ago. Not Cousins, but worstThat's not a bad ceiling considering he sent us packing 2 out of the last 3 post seasons.
Falcons traded from #27 to #6 to select Julio Jones.I like Mac Jones. I just don’t believe he’s gonna be there at the bottom of the 1st round. We’re gonna need to go get him and no one has ever traded up from the bottom of the draft to the top 10 that I can recall off hand.
I always mentioned a caveat: meaningless absent optimum talent requirements for the pro game.But... but... You said college stats are meaningless. Now I don't know what to believe...
You know that statement had to come back and bite at some point
Nope, no such caveat was applied. You said college stats are meaningless. So either they are, they aren't, or ... you change your position depending on what you're trying to argue?I always mentioned a caveat: meaningless absent optimum talent requirements for the pro game.
And brother, Jones has the best arm in rd 1.
Nope.Nope, no such caveat was applied. You said college stats are meaningless. So either they are, they aren't, or ... you change your position depending on what you're trying to argue?
But who am I to answer these difficult questions?