Are the Bengals still looking at a dt? (1 Viewer)

whiteshadowen

Millsaps TC forever
Joined
May 11, 2004
Messages
3,702
Reaction score
709
Age
65
Location
Vicksburg
Offline
Not totally discounting the idea that they are considering him as potentially dropping to 2nd round.

Don't put too much into the fact that they are bringing him in for a medical. You're allowed 30 visits by potential draftees.

They could be "lulling us to sleep" in order to keep us from trading in front of them.
 

JOElittleBIGhorn

Super Forum Fanatic
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
5,530
Reaction score
584
Location
west bank
Offline
We should hope that Kelly's physical goes well. If this isn't a smokescreen, this could make them a candidate for trading back. Well, either that or pulling the '2008 Ted Ginn pick'. :hihi:
 

Super Dad

Super Forum Fanatic
Joined
May 4, 2006
Messages
6,980
Reaction score
1,100
Age
37
Location
Madisonville
Offline
Some guy from Cincy. said he could promise that they would go OT
 

waazup

Marques Colston's #1 Fan
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
6,471
Reaction score
4,231
Location
Los Angeles (USC)
Offline
I've been thinking maybe they'll draft Derrick Harvey over Sedrick Ellis. They have greater needs at DE than DT. Branden Albert could also be a good pick for the Bengals.
 
Last edited:

fish321

Pro-Bowler
Joined
Mar 7, 2007
Messages
682
Reaction score
43
Location
Metairie
Offline
There are going to be a couple of picks that shock us, there always are, its just that usually its not in a good way. Normally its someone jumping just ahead of us to take a guy we covet, maybe this year Cinci takes someone crazy and lets Ellis slip by. Couldnt they also use some help at O line?
 

vntran19

Veteran Starter
Joined
May 6, 2005
Messages
305
Reaction score
70
Offline
Cincy doesn't want us to jump in front of them if S.E is available at 7 r 8 . You're right its a smokescreen .
 

Saints382

Super Forum Fanatic
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
8,608
Reaction score
167
Location
Upstate, NY
Offline
Cincy doesn't want us to jump in front of them if S.E is available at 7 r 8 . You're right its a smokescreen .

That's what it seems like!

But with the uncertainty of "Ocho Cinco" and Housh being only a #2...there could be some legs to it.
 

BoNcHiE

Every team's Elixor
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
57,625
Reaction score
72,648
Offline
That would make no sense. Cincy has a much bigger need at DT then for a 3rd WR.
 

UTSaintsFan

ALL-MADDEN TEAM
Gold VIP Contributor
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
1,928
Reaction score
1,846
Offline
It's probably a smoke screen. They tried to trade for Shaun Rogers and Corey Williams. Now all of a sudden they don't want a DT? I bet they want the Saints to believe they won't take Ellis so we don't try to trade up for him.
 

MSUSousaphone

Owning the CONCACAF
VIP Contributor
Joined
Aug 26, 2004
Messages
15,909
Reaction score
6,321
Age
38
Location
Lake Charles
Offline
That would make no sense. Cincy has a much bigger need at DT then for a 3rd WR.

It has legs with the way the CJ thing is going.

But I agree, I think its more of a 'the Bengals doubt a DT will fall to them' thing than a 'the Bengals will take WR over DT' thing....in fact, I'd bet money on it. I could see them going Gholston (if he dropped) or Harvery over a DT but not a WR.
 

Rum

All-Pro
Joined
Mar 3, 2006
Messages
1,111
Reaction score
0
Location
Elba
Offline
Probably a smokescreen, but maybe they are covering their rears for when we steal GD or SE right in front of them, because they thought they could just sit pat.

Besides, with both Ocho and TJ Whozyamamma unhappy with their contracts, they need a fallback plan. And cutting C. Henry.
 
Last edited:

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

 

New Orleans Saints Twitter Feed

 

Headlines

Top Bottom