- Moderator
- #6,361
Online
Yeah, the precedent has long been clear on this. So far, the court's measured response to vaccine mandates and rules have been upheld. Not surprised to see they're pretty much unanimous on this front.Thankfully it's not looking good for those challenging the mandate.
Breyer's order is the third time the Supreme Court has rejected an attempt to challenge a COVID-19 vaccine mandate. Justice Sonia Sotomayor this month refused to block New York City's requirement that public school teachers and employees be vaccinated. Justice Amy Coney Barrett in August denied a bid by Indiana University students to block that school's vaccination mandate.U.S. Supreme Court justice rejects challenge to Maine COVID-19 vaccine mandate
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer on Tuesday turned away a religious challenge to a requirement that healthcare workers in Maine be vaccinated against COVID-19, the latest such bid rejected by the nation's top judicial body.www.reuters.com
What's interesting here is Barret is a Trump nominee and part of the conservative wing. Historically when these types
of cases go before the whole court they typically follow the ruling of the justice who made the original ruling.
I read another article this morning,but can't find it now. It said the current Supreme Court has no interest in reopening
the Jacobson v. Massachusetts decision made in 1905 which upheld a states right to enforce a vaccine mandate.