Offline
Don't make the assumption that one doesn't know what real discrimination looks like. I can speak on that topic more than I care to but not the place or the time. That being said, because I know what it looks like, I can point it out when I see it. Before any mandates, there were actions in place that were very obvious and they had little to do with public health:
-The attempt to return to normalcy last spring (before the Summer Delta wave) when the vaccinated got laxed restrictions why more scrutiny was placed on the unvaccinated
-The attempt to discredit anyone that had any objection to the vaccine, whether personally legitimate or not
-Remember the NFL's policy created on the assumption that the unvaccinated would be the cause of outbreak in the league (and the "punishments' that went with it)
-Villainizing the front line workers (many survived COVID) when they didn't get the vaccine and many people being vocal about their need to no longer earn a living
-Firing workers based on vax status (let's talk about how unvaccinated 100% remote workers would impact workplace safety)
In reality, this (sadly) hasn't been a matter of "public health" (in the eyes of the decision makers) for a long time. If that was the case, the CDC wouldn't have anything to worry about by being 100% transparent, would they? And because of that, many flags were planted on a hill of incomplete data.
You say you know discrimination, but then you typed all of that and called it discrimination.